Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Pareto 26.10
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Pareto 26.10 is 2.9× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | Pareto 26.10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.80 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $3.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $1.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.03 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 46 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 2 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Pareto 26.10?
Pareto 26.10 is 2.9× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.
More comparisons
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 ArgonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nano Banana 2.1Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Command A+Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPareto 26.10 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.10 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Pareto 26.10 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.10 vs Gemini 4 ArgonPareto 26.10 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Pareto 26.10 vs Nano Banana 2.1