Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.10

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.10

Unbiased
$0.80 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
U
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 5.9× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.10
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.50$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$1.40
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.03
Context window1M1M
Max output236K131K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers9—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Pareto 26.10?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 5.9× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.

More comparisons