Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Pareto 26.10

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.10

Unbiased
$0.80 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
U
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 7.0× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Pareto 26.10 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Haiku 5.5Pareto 26.10
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.50$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.40
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.03
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index36.2—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Pareto 26.10?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 7.0× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.

More comparisons