MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Pareto 26.10

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.10

Unbiased
$0.80 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
U
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.10
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.60$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$1.40
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.03
Context window1M1M
Max output524K131K
Intelligence index28.9—
Coding index——
Providers14—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Pareto 26.10?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.

More comparisons