MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
P

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism Ml
$0.075 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
P
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.075
Output price / 1M$0.28$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.0028
Context window1M262K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-09-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons