Claude Fable 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic

$8.00 / $40.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 91.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 26.7). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	Claude Fable 5.2	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M	$8.00	$0.14
Output price / 1M	$40.00	$0.28
Blended price (3:1)	$16.00	$0.18
Cached input / 1M	$0.20	$0.0028
Context window	1M	1.1M
Max output	128K	131K
Intelligence index	64.6	26.7
Coding index	—	—
Providers	5	8
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-11-07	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 91.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons