MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pareto 26.10

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Pareto 26.10

Unbiased

$0.80 / $3.20

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 8.0× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Pareto 26.10
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.80
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$3.20
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$1.40
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	$0.03
Context window	1.1M	1M
Max output	131K	131K
Intelligence index	26.7	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	10	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-10-15
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Pareto 26.10?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 8.0× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pareto 26.10

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Pareto 26.10

Cost calculator

FAQ

More comparisons