Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.30 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 3.2× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
Llama 4 ScoutQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.30$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.47
Cached input / 1M$0.10
Context window1.3M262K
Max output16K66K
Intelligence index
Coding index8.2
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-052025-07-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Llama 4 Scout is 3.2× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ≈ $1,100.

More comparisons