Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.30 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 8.4× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.30
Output price / 1M$10.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.47
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.10
Context window1M262K
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index60—
Coding index——
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102025-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 8.4× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ≈ $1,100.

More comparisons