Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.30 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 7.1× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.30
Output price / 1M$9.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$0.47
Cached input / 1M—$0.10
Context window131K262K
Max output66K66K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-052025-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 7.1× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash ≈ $7,500, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ≈ $1,100.

More comparisons