Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
NVIDIA
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.7× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.6 vs 13.6). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash FinNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.042$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.12$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.0623$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.0084$0.02
Context window262K1M
Max output33K944K
Intelligence index22.613.6
Coding index55.6—
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-272026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.7× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons