DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.6 vs 22.6). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.042
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.0084
Context window1M262K
Max output393K33K
Intelligence index28.622.6
Coding index—55.6
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons