Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 54.2× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.042
Output price / 1M$9.00$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$0.0623
Cached input / 1M—$0.0084
Context window131K262K
Max output66K33K
Intelligence index—22.6
Coding index—55.6
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-052026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 54.2× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash ≈ $7,500, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons