Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Moonshot AI
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Moonshot AI
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 64.2× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.5 vs 22.6). Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.042
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.0084
Context window1M262K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index46.522.6
Coding index—55.6
Providers23—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-232026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 64.2× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons