Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 69.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 13.6). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.02
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index64.613.6
Coding index——
Providers510
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 69.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons