Nano Banana 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 48.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has the larger context window (262K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.042
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.0623
Cached input / 1M—$0.0084
Context window66K262K
Max output59K33K
Intelligence index—22.6
Coding index—55.6
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 48.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons