Claude Fable 5.2 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 256.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 22.6). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.042
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.0084
Context window1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index64.622.6
Coding index—55.6
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 256.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons