Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
MiniMax
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 4.2× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.1 vs 22.6). MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash FinMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.042$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.12$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.0623$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.0084$0.015
Context window262K1M
Max output33K524K
Intelligence index22.629.1
Coding index55.6—
Providers—11
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-272026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 4.2× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons