Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.2× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.5 vs 22.6). Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.042
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.0084
Context window1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index36.522.6
Coding index—55.6
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.2× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons