Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
S
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 7.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.85$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.85$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window131K262K
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index12.9
Coding index26.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2024-08-282026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 7.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons