GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
S
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 31% cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.85
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.85
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M131K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182024-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 31% cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons