Claude Opus 5.5 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic

$4.00 / $20.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 9.4× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	Claude Opus 5.5	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M	$4.00	$0.85
Output price / 1M	$20.00	$0.85
Blended price (3:1)	$8.00	$0.85
Cached input / 1M	$0.20	—
Context window	1M	131K
Max output	128K	16K
Intelligence index	57.6	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	11	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-22	2024-08-28
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 9.4× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons