Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi

$4.35 / $8.70

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 6.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2	MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Input price / 1M	$0.85	$4.35
Output price / 1M	$0.85	$8.70
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$5.44
Cached input / 1M	—	$0.036
Context window	131K	1M
Max output	16K	131K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	No	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2024-08-28	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 6.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050.

More comparisons