Command A+ vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A+

Cohere
$0.30 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
S
Verdict: Command A+ is 29% cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 131K).
Command A+Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.85
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.85
Blended price (3:1)$0.60$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.15
Context window192K131K
Max output64K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222024-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Command A+ is 29% cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A+ vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons