Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.15 / $0.47

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 3.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2	Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.85	$0.15
Output price / 1M	$0.85	$0.47
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$0.23
Cached input / 1M	—	$0.016
Context window	131K	1M
Max output	16K	131K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	No	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2024-08-28	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 3.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons