DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

$0.022 / $0.40

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.3× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M	$0.022	$0.85
Output price / 1M	$0.40	$0.85
Blended price (3:1)	$0.12	$0.85
Cached input / 1M	$0.004	—
Context window	1M	131K
Max output	944K	16K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	36	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-09-10	2024-08-28
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.3× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons