GLM 5.3 Prime vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Prime

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$2.80 / $8.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
S
Verdict: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 5.1× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M$2.80$0.85
Output price / 1M$8.80$0.85
Blended price (3:1)$4.30$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.56
Context window1M131K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-232024-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Prime or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 5.1× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Prime vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Prime: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Prime ≈ $10,000, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons