Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.9× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.85	$0.14
Output price / 1M	$0.85	$0.28
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$0.18
Cached input / 1M	—	$0.0028
Context window	131K	1M
Max output	16K	131K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	—	2
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	99.9%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	No	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2024-08-28	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.9× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons