Gemma 2 27B vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 8.4× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Gemma 2 27B | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 8K | 8K |
| Max output | 2K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | No |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 8.4× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Command A+Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 2 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.7Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5