DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Gemma 2 27B

Google
$0.65 / $0.65
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Google
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 5.6× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 27B
Input price / 1M$0.022$0.65
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.65
Blended price (3:1)$0.12$0.65
Cached input / 1M$0.004—
Context window1M8K
Max output944K2K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers36—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-102024-07-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 2 27B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 5.6× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625.

More comparisons