Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 103.6× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $4.00 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $20.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $8.00 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 8K |
| Max output | 128K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 57.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 11 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 103.6× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed