GPT-6 Luna vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 2.6× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 8K).
| GPT-6 Luna | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.01 | — |
| Context window | 1.1M | 8K |
| Max output | 128K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 37.3 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 7 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 2.6× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6 Luna vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Luna ≈ $450.00, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Command A+GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolGPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-6 Luna vs Grok 4.7GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed