Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Luna
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-6 Luna is 3.3× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.01 |
| Context window | 8K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 2K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | — | 37.3 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is 3.3× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Luna: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. GPT-6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, GPT-6 Luna ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Command A+Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 2 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.7Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Command A+GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolGPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed