Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 9% cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.09 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 2K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
GLM 5.3 FlashX is 9% cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Command A+Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 2 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.7Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5