Gemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemma 2 27B is 3.7× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.40 |
| Context window | 8K | 500K |
| Max output | 2K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.4 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Grok 4.7?
Gemma 2 27B is 3.7× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Command A+Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 2 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5