Command A+ vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 7.8× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 8K).
| Command A+ | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | — |
| Context window | 192K | 8K |
| Max output | 64K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 7.8× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A+ vs Grok 4.7Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A+ vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A+ vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed