Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.8× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.016 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 2K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.8× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 2 27B vs Command A+Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 2 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.7Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5