R1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

R1

DeepSeek
$0.70 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 12.8× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 11.4). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 64K).
R1Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.70$0.06
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$1.15$0.09
Cached input / 1M—$0.012
Context window64K262K
Max output16K33K
Intelligence index11.424.6
Coding index24.657
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-01-202026-09-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, R1 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 12.8× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

R1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

R1: 64,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons

R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs GPT-6 SolR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 vs Grok 4.7R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Opus 5.5