R1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 49% cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 64K).
| R1 | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.09 |
| Context window | 64K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | — |
| Coding index | 24.6 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
GLM 5.3 FlashX is 49% cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs GPT-6 SolR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 vs Grok 4.7R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5