R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

R1

DeepSeek
$0.70 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 5.0× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 64K).
R1Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.70$0.15
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$1.15$0.23
Cached input / 1M—$0.016
Context window64K1M
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index11.4—
Coding index24.6—
Providers—1
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-01-202026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, R1 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 5.0× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

R1: 64,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons

R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs GPT-6 SolR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 vs Grok 4.7R1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5