R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

R1

DeepSeek
$0.70 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
X
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.6× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 64K).
R1MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$0.70$0.14
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$1.15$0.18
Cached input / 1M—$0.0028
Context window64K1M
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index11.4—
Coding index24.6—
Providers—2
Best provider uptime (30m)—99.9%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-01-202026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, R1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.6× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

R1: 64,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons

R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs GPT-6 SolR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 vs Grok 4.7R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5