R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.6× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (26.7 vs 11.4). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 64K).
| R1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 64K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | 26.7 |
| Coding index | 24.6 | — |
| Providers | — | 8 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.6× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
R1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonR1 vs Claude Fable 5.2R1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashR1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashR1 vs Hy4R1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalR1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraR1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProR1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProR1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017R1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLR1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonR1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5R1 vs Nano Banana 2.1R1 vs Mistral Large 4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Hy4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro