R1 vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: R1 is 2.1× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 11.4). Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 64K).
| R1 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.40 |
| Context window | 64K | 500K |
| Max output | 16K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 24.6 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or Grok 4.7?
R1 is 2.1× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs GPT-6 SolR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5