Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 88.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 24.6). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.06
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index57.624.6
Coding index57
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 88.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons