R1 vs GPT-6 Sol
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: R1 is 3.5× cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Sol scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (47.5 vs 11.4). GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 64K).
| R1 | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.20 |
| Context window | 64K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 16K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | 47.5 |
| Coding index | 24.6 | — |
| Providers | — | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or GPT-6 Sol?
R1 is 3.5× cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs GPT-6 Sol: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. GPT-6 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, GPT-6 Sol ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 vs Grok 4.7R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Command A+GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed