GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-6 Luna Pro

OpenAI
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 2.2× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.06
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.012
Context window1.1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index24.6
Coding index57
Providers6
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna Pro or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 2.2× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Luna Pro ≈ $450.00, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons