GPT-6 Sol vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-6 Sol

OpenAI
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 44.4× cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Sol scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (47.5 vs 24.6). GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.06
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.012
Context window1.1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index47.524.6
Coding index—57
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-09-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 44.4× cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-6 Sol vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-6 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Sol ≈ $9,000, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons

GPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Command A+GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed