R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: R1 is 4.7× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 64K).
| R1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $4.35 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $8.70 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $5.44 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.036 |
| Context window | 64K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | — |
| Coding index | 24.6 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
R1 is 4.7× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050.
More comparisons
R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs GPT-6 SolR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 vs Grok 4.7R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Claude Opus 5.5