Command A vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 56.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 8K).
| Command A | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 8K |
| Max output | 8K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | No |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 56.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5