Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 25.0× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 256K).
| Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 26.7 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | 8 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 25.0× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs Gemini 4 CarbonCommand A vs Claude Fable 5.2Command A vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashCommand A vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashCommand A vs Hy4Command A vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalCommand A vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A vs Mistral Large 4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Hy4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro