Claude Opus 5.5 vs Command A

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
C

Command A

Cohere
$2.50 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
C
Verdict: Command A is 45% cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 13.1). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
Claude Opus 5.5Command A
Input price / 1M$4.00$2.50
Output price / 1M$20.00$10.00
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$4.38
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M256K
Max output128K8K
Intelligence index57.613.1
Coding index—27.8
Providers111
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-222025-03-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Command A?

Command A is 45% cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Command A: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Command A: 256,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Command A ≈ $10,000.

More comparisons

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed